TautaiTautai

Proposed Tools

For Step A3: System Two - Stability and Conflict Resolution, the goal is to identify and establish coordination mechanisms that ensure the stability of operational units (System 1) and resolve conflicts effectively. This step focuses on minimizing oscillations, improving communication, and ensuring smooth collaboration across units within the Viable System Model (VSM).


1. Identifying Operational Conflicts & Instabilities

  • Purpose: Detects areas where operational units (System 1) experience instability, misalignment, or conflict.
  • Methodology:
    • Requisite Variety Principle (Ashby, An Introduction to Cybernetics, 1956) – Ensures coordination mechanisms match the complexity of interactions.
    • Conflict Resolution Framework (Ury, Getting to Yes, 1981) – Focuses on interest-based negotiation.
    • Viable System Model – System 2 Stabilization (Beer, The Heart of Enterprise, 1979) – Identifies areas where coordination mechanisms are weak or missing.
  • Tools:
    • AI-Based Conflict Detection (Bravely, IBM Watson AI, Civility Partners)
    • Real-Time Operational Analytics (Tableau, Power BI, Google Data Studio)

2. Mapping Horizontal Coordination & Dependencies

  • Purpose: Ensures operational units can coordinate without unnecessary reliance on centralized management.
  • Methodology:
    • Mutual Adjustment Theory (Mintzberg, The Structuring of Organizations, 1979) – Focuses on peer-to-peer coordination.
    • Dependency Structure Matrix (Eppinger & Browning, Design Structure Matrix Methods, 2012) – Maps dependencies to optimize coordination.
    • Viable System Model – System 2 Inter-Unit Communication (Beer, 1979) – Establishes real-time feedback loops between operational units.
  • Tools:
    • Organizational Network Analysis (ONA) (Polinode, OrgMapper, Kumu.io)
    • AI-Powered Process Mining (Celonis, Apromore, UiPath Process Mining)

3. Implementing Coordination Mechanisms

  • Purpose: Introduces formal and informal coordination mechanisms to reduce conflicts and improve collaboration.
  • Methodology:
    • Agile Team Coordination (Schwaber & Sutherland, Scrum Guide, 2017) – Uses stand-ups and sprint reviews for frequent alignment.
    • Lean Daily Management (Womack & Jones, Lean Thinking, 1996) – Uses structured huddles and Kanban boards for coordination.
    • Viable System Model – System 2 Dynamic Coordination (Beer, 1979) – Ensures real-time information exchange between units.
  • Tools:
    • Enterprise Collaboration Platforms (Slack AI, Microsoft Viva, Miro)
    • AI-Powered Workflow Coordination (Trello, Jira, Monday.com)

4. Reducing Operational Oscillations & Variability

  • Purpose: Stabilizes interactions between operational units by damping oscillations and preventing system-wide disruptions.
  • Methodology:
    • Negative Feedback Loops (Ashby, 1956) – Uses feedback control to stabilize operations.
    • Lean Six Sigma Variation Reduction (George et al., The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook, 2004) – Reduces process variability.
    • Viable System Model – System 2 Oscillation Management (Beer, 1979) – Creates stabilizing mechanisms for inter-unit coordination.
  • Tools:
    • Real-Time Data Monitoring (Snowflake, Databricks, Apache Kafka)
    • AI-Based Process Stability Analysis (IBM AIOps, Google Vertex AI, Tableau AI)

5. Standardizing Inter-Unit Communication & Protocols

  • Purpose: Establishes clear communication norms and escalation paths to avoid misunderstandings.
  • Methodology:
    • Boundary Spanning (Tushman & Scanlan, Boundary Spanning in Organizations, 1981) – Encourages cross-unit collaboration.
    • Standard Operating Procedures (ISO 9001:2015) – Defines standard interaction protocols.
    • Viable System Model – System 2 Communication Channels (Beer, 1979) – Ensures timely and structured communication between units.
  • Tools:
    • Digital Governance & Documentation Platforms (Notion, Confluence, SharePoint)
    • AI-Based Meeting Insights & Transcription (Otter AI, Fireflies.ai, Microsoft Copilot)

6. Conflict Resolution & Mediation Frameworks

  • Purpose: Establishes methods for resolving disputes between operational units before they escalate.
  • Methodology:
    • Interest-Based Negotiation (Fisher & Ury, Getting to Yes, 1981) – Helps parties resolve disputes based on mutual interests.
    • Nonviolent Communication (Rosenberg, Nonviolent Communication, 1999) – Establishes constructive communication methods.
    • Viable System Model – System 2 Conflict Mediation (Beer, 1979) – Uses feedback loops to resolve conflicts dynamically.
  • Tools:
    • Mediation & Conflict Resolution Platforms (Bravely, Civility Partners, AI Bias Detection)
    • AI-Based Sentiment Analysis for Dispute Detection (IBM Watson NLP, Google AI Ethics)

7. Feedback Loops & Continuous Improvement for Stability

  • Purpose: Ensures that System 2 mechanisms remain effective and evolve with operational needs.
  • Methodology:
    • Kaizen Continuous Improvement (Imai, Kaizen: The Key to Japan’s Competitive Success, 1986) – Encourages iterative stability improvements.
    • PDCA Cycle (Deming, Out of the Crisis, 1982) – Uses Plan-Do-Check-Act for continuous refinement.
    • Viable System Model – System 2 Feedback Channels (Beer, 1979) – Ensures operational units continuously refine coordination.
  • Tools:
    • Retrospective & Review Platforms (Retrium, TeamRetro, Miro Retrospectives)
    • AI-Based Organizational Insights (Google DeepMind, IBM Watson AIOps, Microsoft Copilot)

Summary of Tools & Sources for Step A3: System Two - Stability & Conflict Resolution

CategoryKey Methods & SourcesTools & Platforms
Detecting Operational ConflictsRequisite Variety (Ashby, 1956), Conflict Resolution (Ury, 1981)IBM Watson AI, Tableau, Power BI
Horizontal Coordination MappingMutual Adjustment (Mintzberg, 1979), DSM (Eppinger, 2012)OrgMapper, Kumu.io, Celonis
Implementing CoordinationAgile Teams (Schwaber, 2017), Lean Daily Mgmt (Womack, 1996)Slack AI, Trello, Jira, Microsoft Viva
Reducing OscillationsNegative Feedback (Ashby, 1956), Lean Six Sigma (George, 2004)Snowflake, IBM AIOps, Google Vertex AI
Standardizing CommunicationBoundary Spanning (Tushman, 1981), ISO 9001 (2015)Notion, SharePoint, Otter AI
Conflict ResolutionInterest-Based Negotiation (Fisher & Ury, 1981), NVC (Rosenberg, 1999)Bravely, Civility Partners, AI Ethics Tools
Continuous ImprovementKaizen (Imai, 1986), PDCA Cycle (Deming, 1982)Retrium, TeamRetro, Google DeepMind

Key Takeaways for Implementation

  1. Identify operational instabilities using AI-driven conflict detection and real-time analytics.
  2. Map horizontal dependencies using organizational network analysis and process mining.
  3. Implement structured coordination mechanisms such as Agile stand-ups and Lean Daily Huddles.
  4. Reduce oscillations through negative feedback loops and AI-based stability monitoring.
  5. Establish clear communication protocols using ISO 9001 SOPs and boundary-spanning frameworks.
  6. Use structured conflict resolution with AI-powered mediation and sentiment analysis.
  7. Continuously refine coordination mechanisms using Kaizen and PDCA cycles.

Would you like more insights on case studies or best practices for implementing these tools?